Sunday, October 01, 2006

Petition to Investigate Criminal Acts Committed by Elected Officials

SEPT 28,2006 TREASON INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR ACT PART II

0 Signatures
Created by danne burley on Sep 30, 2006
Category: Justice
Region: United States of America
Target: That the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee
Description/History:
This "Petition" seeking to have a full investigation by the Senate and House Judicial Committees of the Violation of both the Law and fiducially duty of law enforcement officials, States Attorneys, Justices, Policing Agencies and all others tied within Clout, who have violated the law and the Elected Position they currently hold within States all over the United States. Due to a growing pattern of "Conflict of Interest" by Judges within cases and from within the office of the States Attorney(s), Attorney General(s) and by these offices not acting within they're elected roles to protect and prevent discrimination of the people they were placed into office, and paid to serve and protect.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of alleged "theft within Probate Court”, whereby those within these letters state that there is corruption which can be easily investigated within these patterns which can be found within DuPage County within the state of Illinois and other areas across the United States.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of crimes in these cases are directed against the Elderly whereby it has been stated that they are tossed into rehab centers mistreated and robbed by being placed illegally as ward of the state and there are allegations of failure to diagnosis , over medicating of patients, appointing wards of the court who have been alleged to rob the private estates of patients without due process of law and or intervention from those within the State office of Attorney in Illinois as one example of the many complains concerning this issue.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of the crime of those Missing and Who Have Been Presumed Death going back as far as WWII, the Korean, Vietnam and current war conflict. Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of over 8,000 men and women have been spotted within a massive cover-up of what is being alleged as the real treatment of Military Personnel as POW within War Conflicts. Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of seek an independent investigation of the Crime of Profiling and racism within cities across American by the policing forces who are using falsified traffic stops as a measure to search cars, harass and victimized Black men and women without cause with unlawful strip searches which are being conduct without any rule of law but on the basis of discrimination only.
Whereas the People of the United States seek an independent investigation of the Crime of Attacks against Whistleblowers who had documented evidences, and other proof of crimes of RICCO, Stealing from Public and Private Treat and allegations of the World Trade Center Sept 11th, 2001 as being an inside job created as an alleged insurance fraud committed to move billions of dollars based on death into worldwide investment pools.
Whereas the People of the United States seek an independent investigation of all the whistleblowers were lied to and had no protection under the whistle blowing acts, nor were they allowed protected from these acts from losing they're jobs and homes.
Whereas the People of the United States seek an independent investigation of many who have complained of being made victims of Gang Stalking whereby those within clouted positions and tied into the government used there public offices to harm, discredit and or kill whistleblowers who have shared and or attempted to bring out the truth of wrong doing by elected Officials.
Whereas the People of the United States seek an independent investigation of there are also those who state the Court system is worse than ever before because there are allegations of Judges going against canon law, and openly involved within conflict of interest and or misconduct going without investigation by the State and or County Judiciary Board because those who are involved within these allegations have seats on the board and or are member of the association which then serves and protects those within.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of within the Court system of Illinois, Cook County no longer has and can afford Court Reporters in Probate and other courts because of Cook County Budget cuts which now can adverse effect ones right to an appeal due to no court record. This had impact on the poor and those who have little money to provide a defense in matters of handle of estates and theft of the same.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of there has been reported that Circuit Court Records within the county of DuPage County Illinois have been removed to Bahrain India for storage again which can effect a hearing by those involved in rehearing not having original court records.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of these are cases that can no longer can go without investigation and the only way to have a full investigation of these matters is to have the people who have been violated within these acts to come forth within this petition and offer up a letter of attachment by each person who has signed this Petition and who has been violated and a victim of said crimes herein.
Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of all of these in violation of speedy trial Acts under the 6th Amendment, there is also within all these acts and within the new language they are attempting to take away judicial review, illegal arrest, illegal removal of all rights of pro'se litigation, in order to over turn provisions within Faretta vs California which was a criminal case whereby the supreme court stated that WE THE PEOPLE CAN represent themselves in cases. All and all they are attempting to get rid of the speedy trial acts in order to detain not only Terrorist but the People in the United States. Whereas the People of the United States seek and independent investigation of please have all within your family, lines of friendship, those within the schools, the homeless and all Americans and others who are not from this country pass this on and sign to show support of returning America to a Great Nation based on the original Constitution, and to return to the people to right to remove criminals out of office by appointing a special citizen council to investigate these issues. Please we have little time to save our Country.

Petition:

We the Undersigned hereby request that the U.S. Senate President Pro Tempore; U.S. Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, and the Speaker of the House, and U.S. House of Representatives Majority and Minority Leaders, United State Senate and House of Representative Members on the Judiciary Committee, introduce, adopt, fund, and implement , to appoint an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of and implement SEPT 28,2006 TREASON INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR ACT PART II UNDER article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by State Elected Officials, which will include within various states: The person within the seat of Attorney General, Office of the States Attorney, State Judges, and they're Policing Agents within those townships, cities, and counties which apply and all other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to coverup, corruption, acts of crimes such as; harrassment and targeting of whistleblower who have signed within this petition and provided a letter in evidence of said actions used by politically tied officials within policing agents in various towns and states.
Whereby as stated within the The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (or Whistleblowers' Act as it is commonly referred to) introduces specific statutory protection against victimisation and dismissal for those employees who "blow the whistle" on their employers for wrongdoing at work. It does this by amending the Employment Rights Act 1996, which was adopted to protect Whistleblowers from: Firing or laying off Blacklisting Demoting Denying overtime or promotion Disciplining Denial of benefits Failure to hire or rehire Intimidation Reassignment affecting prospects for promotion Reducing pay or hours and, whereby those who within this signed petition are victims of attacks public and private whereby those within these reported agencies have misused they're political clout within they're elected position to use acts of agression in order to commit bodly harm, crimes of forcing the whistleblower into bankruptcy, false allegations and use of policing forces within their ties to create criminals out of whistleblowers in order to shut them up and down financially. Under the law of Qui Tam as stated below shall upon finding of this misconduct should be adopted automatedly to provide financial Restidution to all who have provided evidence within letters, and statements of police harassment, "SETUP'S" created by the policing agencies and hired criminals/assassins who are hired and paid to assassinate careers, repretations, financially incriminate, harm the children, family members, friends and love ones of those who had sought to bring forth evidence of said corruption within places of employment, the media and relating to journalist, former Circuit Court Clerks and they're Deputies, Private and Public Employees who have been victims of these attacks based on their witnessing corruption of State, County, City, local Officials with the use of "Clout".
Whereby there is allegations of violation of this act under TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1985 § 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights(Whereby under this act is in open practice within State Courts and under - (2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; ( Is in violation of these elected officials Offices and based on the allegations of these crimes (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.
TITLE 31. MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE III. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 37. CLAIMS SUBCHAPTER III. CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 3729.False claims (a) Liability for certain acts. Any person who--(1) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the United States Government or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; (B) such person fully cooperated with any Government investigation of such violation; and (C) at the time such person furnished the United States with the information about the violation, no criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative action had commenced under this title with respect to such violation, and the person did not have actual knowledge of the existence of an investigation into such violation;the court may assess not less than 2 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act of the person. A person violating this subsection shall also be liable to the United States Government for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any such penalty or damages. (b) Knowing and knowingly defined. For purposes of this section, the terms "knowing" and "knowingly" mean that a person, with respect to information-- (1) has actual knowledge of the information; (2) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or (3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information, and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required. (c) Claim defined. For purposes of this section, "claim" includes any request or demand, whether under a contract or otherwise, for money or property which is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the United States Government provides any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded, or if the Government will reimburse such contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded.(d) Exemption from disclosure. Any information furnished pursuant to subparagraphs (A) through (C) of subsection (a) shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5.(e) Exclusion. This section does not apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [Title 26, USCS].
TITLE 31.MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE III.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 37.CLAIMS SUBCHAPTER III.CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT31 USCS 3730 (1994) 3730. Civil actions for false claims (c) Rights of the parties to qui tam actions. (1) If the Government proceeds with the action, it shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and shall not be bound by an act of the person bringing the action. Such person shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2).
(TITLE 31. MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE III. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 37. CLAIMS SUBCHAPTER III. CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 31 USCS 3731 (1994) 3731.
False claims procedure (a) A subpena requiring the attendance of a witness at a trial or hearing conducted under section 3730 of this title [31 USCS 3730] may be served at any place in the United States. (b) A civil action under section 3730 may not be brought-- (1) more than 6 years after the date on which the violation of section 3729 is committed, or (2) more than 3 years after the date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been known by the official of the United States charged with responsibility to act in the circumstances, but in no event more than 10 years after the date on which the violation is committed, whichever occurs last. (c) In any action brought under section 3730, the United States shall be required to prove all essential elements of the cause of action, including damages, by a preponderance of the evidence. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or the Federal Rules of Evidence, a final judgment rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding charging fraud or false statements, whether upon a verdict after trial or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, shall estop the defendant from denying the essential elements of the offense in any action which involves the same transaction as in the criminal proceeding and which is brought under subsection (a) or (b) of section 3730.
TITLE 31.MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE III.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 37.CLAIMS SUBCHAPTER III.CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 31 USCS 3732 (1994)3732.
False claims jurisdiction (a) Actions under section 3730. Any action under section 3730 may be brought in any judicial district in which the defendant or, in the case of multiple defendants, any one defendant can be found, resides, transacts business, or in which any act proscribed by section 3729 occurred. A summons as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be issued by the appropriate district court and served at any place within or outside the United States. (b) Claims under state law. The district courts shall have jurisdiction over any action brought under the laws of any State for the recovery of funds paid by a State or local government if the action arises from the same transaction or occurrence as an action brought under section 3730.
TITLE 31. MONEY AND FINANCESUBTITLE III. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTCHAPTER 37. CLAIMSSUBCHAPTER III. CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT31 USCS 3733 (1994) 3733.
Civil investigative demands (a) In general. (1) Issuance and service. Whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that any person may be in possession, custody, or control of any documentary material or information relevant to a false claims law investigation, the Attorney General may, before commencing a civil proceeding under section 3730 or other false claims law, issue in writing and cause to be served upon such person, a civil investigative demand requiring such person-- (Whereby the Attorney General in these cases refuse to investigate, and or prosecute those involved in these crimes, which is in violated of this act and in violation of the laws in place to protect the persons and or persons family members and friends from harm and other retaliation from those who use clout and there connections to sent out john and Jane Does as actors to commit criminal acts against those who had whistleblowed on crime and corruption within these cities, counties, states, townships, and all other departments within government their influence can use. (A) to produce such documentary material for inspection and copying, (B) to answer in writing written interrogatories with respect to such documentary material or information, (C) to give oral testimony concerning such documentary material or information, or (D) to furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony. The Attorney General may not delegate the authority to issue civil investigative demands under this subsection. Whenever a civil investigative demand is an express demand for any product of discovery, the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or an Assistant Attorney General shall cause to be served, in any manner authorized by this section, a copy of such demand upon the person from whom the discovery was obtained and shall notify the person to whom such demand is issued of the date on which such copy was served. (2) Contents and deadlines. (A) Each civil investigative demand issued under paragraph (1) shall state the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation of a false claims law which is under investigation, and the applicable provision of law alleged to be violated. (B) If such demand is for the production of documentary material, the demand shall-- (i) describe each class of documentary material to be produced with such definiteness and certainty as to permit such material to be fairly identified; (ii) prescribe a return date for each such class which will provide a reasonable period of time within which the material so demanded may be assembled and made available for inspection and copying; and (iii) identify the false claims law investigator to whom such material shall be made available. (C) If such demand is for answers to written interrogatories, the demand shall-- (i) set forth with specificity the written interrogatories to be answered; (ii) prescribe dates at which time answers to written interrogatories shall be submitted; and (iii) identify the false claims law investigator to whom such answers shall be submitted.(D) If such demand is for the giving of oral testimony, the demand shall-- (i) prescribe a date, time, and place at which oral testimony shall be commenced; (ii) identify a false claims law investigator who shall conduct the examination and the custodian to whom the transcript of such examination shall be submitted; (iii) specify that such attendance and testimony are necessary to the conduct of the investigation; (iv) notify the person receiving the demand of the right to be accompanied by an attorney and any other representative; and (v) describe the general purpose for which the demand is being issued and the general nature of the testimony, including the primary areas of inquiry, which will be taken pursuant to the demand. (E) Any civil investigative demand issued under this section which is an express demand for any product of discovery shall not be returned or returnable until 20 days after a copy of such demand has been served upon the person from whom the discovery was obtained. (F) The date prescribed for the commencement of oral testimony pursuant to a civil investigative demand issued under this section shall be a date which is not less than seven days after the date on which demand is received, unless the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General determines that exceptional circumstances are present which warrant the commencement of such testimony within a lesser period of time. (G) The Attorney General shall not authorize the issuance under this section of more than one civil investigative demand for oral testimony by the same person unless the person requests otherwise or unless the Attorney General, after investigation, notifies that person in writing that an additional demand for oral testimony is necessary. The Attorney General may not, notwithstanding section 510 of title 28, authorize the performance, by any other officer, employee, or agency, of any function vested in the Attorney General under this subparagraph. (b) Protected material or information.(1) In general. A civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) may not require the production of any documentary material, the submission of any answers to written interrogatories, or the giving of any oral testimony if such material, answers, or testimony would be protected from disclosure under-- (A) the standards applicable to subpoenas or subpoenas duces tecum issued by a court of the United States to aid in a grand jury investigation; or (B) the standards applicable to discovery requests under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent that the application of such standards to any such demand is appropriate and consistent with the provisions and purposes of this section. (2) Effect on other orders, rules, and laws. Any such demand which is an express demand for any product of discovery supersedes any inconsistent order, rule, or provision of law (other than this section) preventing or restraining disclosure of such product of discovery to any person. Disclosure of any product of discovery pursuant to any such express demand does not constitute a waiver of any right or privilege which the person making such disclosure may be entitled to invoke to resist discovery of trial preparation materials. (c) Service; jurisdiction. (1) By whom served. Any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) may be served by a false claims law investigator, or by a United States marshal or a deputy marshal, at any place within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States.(2) Service in foreign countries. Any such demand or any petition filed under subsection (j) may be served upon any person who is not found within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States in such manner as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure prescribe for service in a foreign country. To the extent that the courts of the United States can assert jurisdiction over any such person consistent with due process, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have the same jurisdiction to take any action respecting compliance with this section by any such person that such court would have if such person were personally within the jurisdiction of such court. (d) Service upon legal entities and natural persons. (1) Legal entities. Service of any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) or of any petition filed under subsection (j) may be made upon a partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity by-- (A) delivering an executed copy of such demand or petition to any partner, executive officer, managing agent, or general agent of the partnership, corporation, association, or entity, or to any agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process on behalf of such partnership, corporation, association, or entity; (B) delivering an executed copy of such demand or petition to the principal office or place of business of the partnership, corporation, association, or entity; or (C) depositing an executed copy of such demand or petition in the United States mails by registered or certified mail, with a return receipt requested, addressed to such partnership, corporation, association, or entity at its principal office or place of business. (2) Natural persons. Service of any such demand or petition may be made upon any natural person by-- (A) delivering an executed copy of such demand or petition to the person; or (B) depositing an executed copy of such demand or petition in the United States mails by registered or certified mail, with a return receipt requested, addressed to the person at the person's residence or principal office or place of business. (e) Proof of service. A verified return by the individual serving any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) or any petition filed under subsection (j) setting forth the manner of such service shall be proof of such service. In the case of service by registered or certified mail, such return shall be accompanied by the return post office receipt of delivery of such demand. (f) Documentary material. (1) Sworn certificates. The production of documentary material in response to a civil investigative demand served under this section shall be made under a sworn certificate, in such form as the demand designates, by-- (A) in the case of a natural person, the person to whom the demand is directed, or (B) in the case of a person other than a natural person, a person having knowledge of the facts and circumstances relating to such production and authorized to act on behalf of such person. The certificate shall state that all of the documentary material required by the demand and in the possession, custody, or control of the person to whom the demand is directed has been produced and made available to the false claims law investigator identified in the demand. (2) Production of materials. Any person upon whom any civil investigative demand for the production of documentary material has been served under this section shall make such material available for inspection and copying to the false claims law investigator identified in such demand at the principal place of business of such person, or at such other place as the false claims law investigator and the person thereafter may agree and prescribe in writing, or as the court may direct under subsection (j)(1). Such material shall be made so available on the return date specified in such demand, or on such later date as the false claims law investigator may prescribe in writing. Such person may, upon written agreement between the person and the false claims law investigator, substitute copies for originals of all or any part of such material. (g) Interrogatories. Each interrogatory in a civil investigative demand served under this section shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath and shall be submitted under a sworn certificate, in such form as the demand designates, by-- (1) in the case of a natural person, the person to whom the demand is directed, or(2) in the case of a person other than a natural person, the person or persons responsible for answering each interrogatory. If any interrogatory is objected to, the reasons for the objection shall be stated in the certificate instead of an answer. The certificate shall state that all information required by the demand and in the possession, custody, control, or knowledge of the person to whom the demand is directed has been submitted. To the extent that any information is not furnished, the information shall be identified and reasons set forth with particularity regarding the reasons why the information was not furnished. (h) Oral examinations. (1) Procedures. The examination of any person pursuant to a civil investigative demand for oral testimony served under this section shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths and affirmations by the laws of the United States or of the place where the examination is held. The officer before whom the testimony is to be taken shall put the witness on oath or affirmation and shall, personally or by someone acting under the direction of the officer and in the officer's presence, record the testimony of the witness. The testimony shall be taken stenographically and shall be transcribed. When the testimony is fully transcribed, the officer before whom the testimony is taken shall promptly transmit a copy of the transcript of the testimony to the custodian. This subsection shall not preclude the taking of testimony by any means authorized by, and in a manner consistent with, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (2) Persons present. The false claims law investigator conducting the examination shall exclude from the place where the examination is held all persons except the person giving the testimony, the attorney for and any other representative of the person giving the testimony, the attorney for the Government, any person who may be agreed upon by the attorney for the Government and the person giving the testimony, the officer before whom the testimony is to be taken, and any stenographer taking such testimony. (3) Where testimony taken. The oral testimony of any person taken pursuant to a civil investigative demand served under this section shall be taken in the judicial district of the United States within which such person resides, is found, or transacts business, or in such other place as may be agreed upon by the false claims law investigator conducting the examination and such person.(4) Transcript of testimony. When the testimony is fully transcribed, the false claims law investigator or the officer before whom the testimony is taken shall afford the witness, who may be accompanied by counsel, a reasonable opportunity to examine and read the transcript, unless such examination and reading are waived by the witness. Any changes in form or substance which the witness desires to make shall be entered and identified upon the transcript by the officer or the false claims law investigator, with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for making such changes. The transcript shall then be signed by the witness, unless the witness in writing waives the signing, is ill, cannot be found, or refuses to sign. If the transcript is not signed by the witness within 30 days after being afforded a reasonable opportunity to examine it, the officer or the false claims law investigator shall sign it and state on the record the fact of the waiver, illness, absence of the witness, or the refusal to sign, together with the reasons, if any, given therefor. (5) Certification and delivery to custodian. The officer before whom the testimony is taken shall certify on the transcript that the witness was sworn by the officer and that the transcript is a true record of the testimony given by the witness, and the officer or false claims law investigator shall promptly deliver the transcript, or send the transcript by registered or certified mail, to the custodian. (6) Furnishing or inspection of transcript by witness. Upon payment of reasonable charges therefor, the false claims law investigator shall furnish a copy of the transcript to the witness only, except that the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or an Assistant Attorney General may, for good cause, limit such witness to inspection of the official transcript of the witness' testimony.(7) Conduct of oral testimony.(A) Any person compelled to appear for oral testimony under a civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel. Counsel may advise such person, in confidence, with respect to any question asked of such person. Such person or counsel may object on the record to any question, in whole or in part, and shall briefly state for the record the reason for the objection. An objection may be made, received, and entered upon the record when it is claimed that such person is entitled to refuse to answer the question on the grounds of any constitutional or other legal right or privilege, including the privilege against self-incrimination. Such person may not otherwise object to or refuse to answer any question, and may not directly or through counsel otherwise interrupt the oral examination. If such person refuses to answer any question, a petition may be filed in the district court of the United States under subsection (j)(1) for an order compelling such person to answer such question.(B) If such person refuses to answer any question on the grounds of the privilege against self-incrimination, the testimony of such person may be compelled in accordance with the provisions of part V of title 18. (8) Witness fees and allowances. Any person appearing for oral testimony under a civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) shall be entitled to the same fees and allowances which are paid to witnesses in the district courts of the United States. (i) Custodians of documents, answers, and transcripts. (1) Designation. The Attorney General shall designate a false claims law investigator to serve as custodian of documentary material, answers to interrogatories, and transcripts of oral testimony received under this section, and shall designate such additional false claims law investigators as the Attorney General determines from time to time to be necessary to serve as deputies to the custodian. (2) Responsibility for materials; disclosure. (A) A false claims law investigator who receives any documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony under this section shall transmit them to the custodian. The custodian shall take physical possession of such material, answers, or transcripts and shall be responsible for the use made of them and for the return of documentary material under paragraph (4).(B) The custodian may cause the preparation of such copies of such documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony as may be required for official use by any false claims law investigator, or other officer or employee of the Department of Justice, who is authorized for such use under regulations which the Attorney General shall issue. Such material, answers, and transcripts may be used by any such authorized false claims law investigator or other officer or employee in connection with the taking of oral testimony under this section. (C) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony, or copies thereof, while in the possession of the custodian, shall be available for examination by any individual other than a false claims law investigator or other officer or employee of the Department of Justice authorized under subparagraph (B). The prohibition in the preceding sentence on the availability of material, answers, or transcripts shall not apply if consent is given by the person who produced such material, answers, or transcripts, or, in the case of any product of discovery produced pursuant to an express demand for such material, consent is given by the person from whom the discovery was obtained. Nothing in this subparagraph is intended to prevent disclosure to the Congress, including any committee or subcommittee of the Congress, or to any other agency of the United States for use by such agency in furtherance of its statutory responsibilities. Disclosure of information to any such other agency shall be allowed only upon application, made by the Attorney General to a United States district court, showing substantial need for the use of the information by such agency in furtherance of its statutory responsibilities. (D) While in the possession of the custodian and under such reasonable terms and conditions as the Attorney General shall prescribe-- (i) documentary material and answers to interrogatories shall be available for examination by the person who produced such material or answers, or by a representative of that person authorized by that person to examine such material and answers; and (ii) transcripts of oral testimony shall be available for examination by the person who produced such testimony, or by a representative of that person authorized by that person to examine such transcripts.(3) Use of material, answers, or transcripts in other proceedings. Whenever any attorney of the Department of Justice has been designated to appear before any court, grand jury, or Federal agency in any case or proceeding, the custodian of any documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony received under this section may deliver to such attorney such material, answers, or transcripts for official use in connection with any such case or proceeding as such attorney determines to be required. Upon the completion of any such case or proceeding, such attorney shall return to the custodian any such material, answers, or transcripts so delivered which have not passed into the control of such court, grand jury, or agency through introduction into the record of such case or proceeding. (4) Conditions for return of material. If any documentary material has been produced by any person in the course of any false claims law investigation pursuant to a civil investigative demand under this section, and-- (A) any case or proceeding before the court or grand jury arising out of such investigation, or any proceeding before any Federal agency involving such material, has been completed, or (B) no case or proceeding in which such material may be used has been commenced within a reasonable time after completion of the examination and analysis of all documentary material and other information assembled in the course of such investigation,the custodian shall, upon written request of the person who produced such material, return to such person any such material (other than copies furnished to the false claims law investigator under subsection (f)(2) or made for the Department of Justice under paragraph (2)(B)) which has not passed into the control of any court, grand jury, or agency through introduction into the record of such case or proceeding. (5) Appointment of successor custodians. In the event of the death, disability, or separation from service in the Department of Justice of the custodian of any documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony produced pursuant to a civil investigative demand under this section, or in the event of the official relief of such custodian from responsibility for the custody and control of such material, answers, or transcripts, the Attorney General shall promptly-- (A) designate another false claims law investigator to serve as custodian of such material, answers, or transcripts, and (B) transmit in writing to the person who produced such material, answers, or testimony notice of the identity and address of the successor so designated. Any person who is designated to be a successor under this paragraph shall have, with regard to such material, answers, or transcripts, the same duties and responsibilities as were imposed by this section upon that person's predecessor in office, except that the successor shall not be held responsible for any default or dereliction which occurred before that designation. (j) Judicial proceedings. (1) Petition for enforcement. Whenever any person fails to comply with any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a), or whenever satisfactory copying or reproduction of any material requested in such demand cannot be done and such person refuses to surrender such material, the Attorney General may file, in the district court of the United States for any judicial district in which such person resides, is found, or transacts business, and serve upon such person a petition for an order of such court for the enforcement of the civil investigative demand. (2) Petition to modify or set aside demand. (A) Any person who has received a civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) may file, in the district court of the United States for the judicial district within which such person resides, is found, or transacts business, and serve upon the false claims law investigator identified in such demand a petition for an order of the court to modify or set aside such demand. In the case of a petition addressed to an express demand for any product of discovery, a petition to modify or set aside such demand may be brought only in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the proceeding in which such discovery was obtained is or was last pending. Any petition under this subparagraph must be filed-- (i) within 20 days after the date of service of the civil investigative demand, or at any time before the return date specified in the demand, whichever date is earlier, or(ii) within such longer period as may be prescribed in writing by any false claims law investigator identified in the demand. (B) The petition shall specify each ground upon which the petitioner relies in seeking relief under subparagraph (A), and may be based upon any failure of the demand to comply with the provisions of this section or upon any constitutional or other legal right or privilege of such person. During the pendency of the petition in the court, the court may stay, as it deems proper, the running of the time allowed for compliance with the demand, in whole or in part, except that the person filing the petition shall comply with any portions of the demand not sought to be modified or set aside. (3) Petition to modify or set aside demand for product of discovery. (A) In the case of any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) which is an express demand for any product of discovery, the person from whom such discovery was obtained may file, in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the proceeding in which such discovery was obtained is or was last pending, and serve upon any false claims law investigator identified in the demand and upon the recipient of the demand, a petition for an order of such court to modify or set aside those portions of the demand requiring production of any such product of discovery. Any petition under this subparagraph must be filed--(i) within 20 days after the date of service of the civil investigative demand, or at any time before the return date specified in the demand, whichever date is earlier, or (ii) within such longer period as may be prescribed in writing by any false claims law investigator identified in the demand.(B) The petition shall specify each ground upon which the petitioner relies in seeking relief under subparagraph (A), and may be based upon any failure of the portions of the demand from which relief is sought to comply with the provisions of this section, or upon any constitutional or other legal right or privilege of the petitioner. During the pendency of the petition, the court may stay, as it deems proper, compliance with the demand and the running of the time allowed for compliance with the demand. (4) Petition to require performance by custodian of duties. At any time during which any custodian is in custody or control of any documentary material or answers to interrogatories produced, or transcripts of oral testimony given, by any person in compliance with any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a), such person, and in the case of an express demand for any product of discovery, the person from whom such discovery was obtained, may file, in the district court of the United States for the judicial district within which the office of such custodian is situated, and serve upon such custodian, a petition for an order of such court to require the performance by the custodian of any duty imposed upon the custodian by this section. (5) Jurisdiction. Whenever any petition is filed in any district court of the United States under this subsection, such court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter so presented, and to enter such order or orders as may be required to carry out the provisions of this section. Any final order so entered shall be subject to appeal under section 1291 of title 28. Any disobedience of any final order entered under this section by any court shall be punished as a contempt of the court. (6) Applicability of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to any petition under this subsection, to the extent that such rules are not inconsistent with the provisions of this section. (k) Disclosure exemption. Any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony provided under any civil investigative demand issued under subsection (a) shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5. (l) Definitions. For purposes of this section-- (1) the term "false claims law" means-- (A) this section and sections 3729 through 3732; and (B) any Act of Congress enacted after the date of the enactment of this section [enacted Oct. 27, 1986] which prohibits, or makes available to the United States in any court of the United States any civil remedy with respect to, any false claim against, bribery of, or corruption of any officer or employee of the United States; (2) the term "false claims law investigation" means any inquiry conducted by any false claims law investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person is or has been engaged in any violation of a false claims law; (3) the term "false claims law investigator" means any attorney or investigator employed by the Department of Justice who is charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into effect any false claims law, or any officer or employee of the United States acting under the direction and supervision of such attorney or investigator in connection with a false claims law investigation; (4) the term "person" means any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, including any State or political subdivision of a State; (5) the term "documentary material" includes the original or any copy of any book, record, report, memorandum, paper, communication, tabulation, chart, or other document, or data compilations stored in or accessible through computer or other information retrieval systems, together with instructions and all other materials necessary to use or interpret such data compilations, and any product of discovery; (6) the term "custodian" means the custodian, or any deputy custodian, designated by the Attorney General under subsection (i)(1); and (7) the term "product of discovery" includes-- (A) the original or duplicate of any deposition, interrogatory, document, thing, result of the inspection of land or other property, examination, or admission, which is obtained by any method of discovery in any judicial or administrative proceeding of an adversarial nature; (B) any digest, analysis, selection, compilation, or derivation of any item listed in subparagraph (A); and (C) any index or other manner of access to any item listed in subparagraph (A).
The SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 TREASON INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR
ACT IIJoint Res. _______ 1__th CONGRESS ____ SessionJoint Res. _______To appoint an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by Elected Officials and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out and/or causing to be carried out an attack upon the people of the United States who are whistleblowers who have loss there rights under the constitution, bill of rights and within Federal laws which were in place to protect these people and there families within the guise of a strategic deception operation of corruption and within the intent to coverup criminal activities within these States Cities and Counties thoughout the United States with Actors within this conspiracy aboard. JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESDate: ____________________Sen. ________________________ and Rep. ____________________________________ introduced the following Joint Resolution of the Congress of the United StatesA JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESTo appoint an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a strategic deception operation.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,WHEREAS, U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does planned and carryied out acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a strategic deception operation; andWHEREAS, the goals of the strategic deception operation of September 11, 2001 included providing a pretext for the unilateral abrogation of the ABM Treaty (announced by U.S. President George W. Bush on June 13, 2002) and for the weaponization of space; for the abrogation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution; and for the launching of illegal wars of aggression in violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations. WHEREAS, There is a sufficient legal threshold of evidence to issue an indictment for the crime of Treason against these individuals under the US Constitution, which in Article III(3) provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court."SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the `The SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 TREASON Independent Prosecutor Act'.SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITION AGAINST TREASON AGAINST THESE UNITED STATES.Congress reaffirms the prohibition under the US Constitution, which in Article III(3) provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court."SEC. 3.
APPOINTMENT AND FUNDING OF A SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 INDEPENDENT PROSECUTORCongress hereby appoints and fully funds an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against those who currently occupy offices within various counties cities and states, who have used their political connections and influence to corruption law enforcement and other John and Jane Does to commit crimes against Whistleblowers who are Federal, State, State, City, County, Private, Public Employees current and past, and citizens who had witnessed criminal activities committed by those who are elected into the office of Attorney General, State Attorney, State Circuit Court Judges, and within there policing agencies with John and Jane Does working as their paid and or non paid agents who have misused there elected offices to commit criminal acts against whistle blowers and citzens of the United States of America and the world. Who have been Indentified as commiting acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out and/or causing to be carried out attack upon the Whistle Blowers within the United States, in the guise of a strategic deception operation.SEC. 4. REPORTSThe SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 TREASON act II shall seek an Independent Prosecutor who shall submit public progress reports to the Congress every 90 days whereby this notice with be furnished to the public via the media, print and televised reports in order to let the public know the statist of this case matter. Whereby upon receipt of this petition with the letters from the people who have acted as whistleblowers whereby they had stated within these letters actions taken against them in violation of the constitutional Amendments, Civil Right Laws, Canon Law for Judges and the laws within the Criminal Code, and all other rules of law which apply.
Whereby TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1983 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights is violated by those elected within these offices.
Whereby Civil Rights. 42 U. S. C. Section 1982. Black Homebuyers Are Entitled to Damages Equal to the Increments in Prices of Homes in Black Neighborhoods That Result from Dual Housing Markets Caused by Racial Discrimination. Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc., 501 F. 2d 324 (7th Cir.), Cert. Denied, 95 S. Ct. 657 (1974) Harvard Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 7 (May, 1975), pp. 1610-1620 is violated within State Court and not used within many cases to protect the civil rights of Blacks within housing cases by Judges who have failured to do there duty as stated herein, and who have acted in violations of Judicary Canon Rules which are not investigated and or acted on by those governing bodies within the states herein mentioned within this petition.
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1981§ 1981. Equal rights under the law (a) Statement of equal rights are not being allowed within court system whereby cases past and present have been ruled on expartee without judicial interventive whereby defendants and plaintiff's have loss there cases due to this and excessive power of Judges to over state rules of laws. All in violation of this act and all against canon rules within the judicial practice and procedures within the various states, city laws and district codes. END.
URL OF THE SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 TREASON INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR ACT II
Sign the petition

The SEPT 28,2006 TREASON INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR ACT PART II petition to That the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee was written by danne burley.
The petition is hosted free of charge at www.gopetition.com. There is no express or implied endorsement of this petition by gopetition.com pty ltd.
Tell a friend Signature list Contact author Petition's forum


http://www.gopetition.com/online/9738.html